Speaker: Sauli Lindberg Title: Taylor's conjecture on magnetic helicity dissipation in magnetohydrodynamics Abstract: 'Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) couples Navier-Stokes equations and Maxwell equations to study the macroscopic behaviour of plasmas and liquid metals. In ideal MHD, where fluid viscosity and electrical resistivity are assumed to vanish, smooth solutions conserve total energy, cross helicity and magnetic helicity in time. Simulations point, however, towards anomalous dissipation where in near-ideal MHD, total energy dissipation rate approaches a non-zero constant when viscosity and resistivity tend to zero. A similar phenomenon has been observed for total kinetic energy in Navier-Stokes equations. In order to reconcile the (deterministic) Navier-Stokes equations with anomalous dissipation, the famous physicist and chemist Onsager (Nuovo Cimento 1949) conjectured that weak solutions of Euler equations can dissipate total kinetic energy as long as they are non-smooth enough. After a series of works starting from Scheffer (J. Geom. Anal. 1993), Shnirelman (Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 1999) and de Lellis-Székelyhidi (Ann. Math. 2009), the conjecture was recently proved by Isett (Ann. Math. 2018) and Buckmaster-de Lellis-Székelyhidi-Vicol (Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 2018). By modifying the tools of de Lellis-Székelyhidi 2009, it has also been shown that weak solutions can dissipate numerous classically conserved quantities in fluid dynamics. Taylor (Phys. Rev. Lett. 1974) conjectured, however, that magnetic helicity is approximately conserved in MHD at very small resistivities. Mathematically, the conjecture says that magnetic helicity is conserved by weak solutions at the inviscid limit of Leray-Hopf solutions. Daniel Faraco and I recently proved the mathematical version of the conjecture (https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09526, to appear in Comm. Math. Phys.) after prior work of Caflisch-Klapper-Steele (Comm. Math Phys. 1997) and others. In the first part of the talk I discuss anomalous dissipation and Onsager's and Taylor's conjectures in non-technical fashion, and in the second part I present a proof of Taylor's conjecture.'